. I believe 10'-4" shown on eoRs S2.2 is a mistake as the architectural drawing for the area show 10'-1" as DBM has detailed and released. Oddly enough however, 13'2" ディメンシオンインクエストシオンオン eoRs S2.2 アプリルズ to be correct over 12'6" ディメンシオンショーン in our fieldwing. Was there possibly some correspondence at some point that changed this dimension from the 13'-2" dimensions shown on A201NW (dating as far back as 100% permit set) to 12'6" as currently detailed and released? この新しい i .know so i continue i の i は、i の i の i の i の i の i の方法で、私の方法で、私は、私のwillのベレキレとi will confirm what was done by the concrete guys in the field the next time i head to to site.
正在翻譯中..