Enright 認為臨床工作者在帶個案進入寬恕治療時，需先確定一些不完

Enright 認為臨床工作者在帶個案進入寬恕治療時，需先確定一些不完全或錯誤的寬恕迷思，例如許多人會把原諒(condonation)當作寬恕，但如果仔細討論其觀念及內涵，會發現他們是同義詞但並非相同涵義的。為了界定寬恕和非寬恕的意涵，Enright 提出ㄧ份迷思檢核表(見表2-2),幫助來談者很快澄清寬恕迷思。此檢核表分三個部份討論，第一部分為迷思與寬恕在哲學上的主要區分；第二部份為界定部分正確但不完全屬於寬恕的描述語；第三部份為普遍意與寬恕混淆的口語用語。

結果 (英文) 1:

Enright thought when treated by clinicians who bring cases to the forgiveness, you first identify incomplete or erroneous myth of forgiveness, for example many people will forgive (condonation) as forgiving, but if you carefully discuss their ideas and content, will find that they are synonymous, but not the same meaning. In order to define the meaning of forgiveness and non-forgiveness, Enright presented one myth review checklist (see table 2-2), helping to talk soon to clarify the myth of forgiveness. Discuss this checklist consists of three parts, part myth and philosophy of forgiveness in the main distinction part part II for the definition of the right, but not exactly belong to the descriptions of forgiveness;Confusion part as the general meaning and forgiveness spoken language.

結果 (英文) 2:

Enright think clinicians in the cases go into remission with treatment, you must first determine the number of incomplete or erroneous myths forgiveness, for example many people will forgive (condonation) as forgiveness, but if carefully discuss their ideas and content, will find They are synonyms, but not the same meaning. In order to define the meaning of forgiveness and non-forgiveness, Enright asked ㄧ copies myth Checklist (see Table 2-2), who quickly helped to clarify talk about forgiveness myth. This checklist is divided into three part discussion, the first part is the main distinction between myth and forgiveness in philosophy; second part is defined partly correct but not entirely forgiven description language; third part of the universal meaning and Forgiveness confusion spoken language.

結果 (英文) 3:

Enright thinks that the clinical worker when belt case enters the forgiveness treatment, must first be more definite not completely or the wrong forgiveness mysticism, for example many people forgiving (condonation) will treat as the forgiveness, but if discussed carefully its idea and connotation, will discover that they will be the synonym but are not same implications. In order to limit the meaning of forgiveness and non-forgiveness, Enright proposed that the ㄧ share mysticism control table (see Table 2-2), the help discussed clarifies the forgiveness mysticism quickly. This control table is divided three some to discuss that the first part is the main discrimination of mysticism and forgiveness in philosophy; Part 2 to limit the part is correct, but completely is not the description language of forgiveness;Part 3 is universal Italian and spoken language terminology of forgiveness confusion.