在整體模型中，moderated moderated mediatio

在整體模型中，moderated moderated mediation的指標達到顯著(index = .03, SE = .02, 95% CI = [.00, .07])，顯示次要干擾變數(知覺組織支持)，對於主要干擾變數(情緒調節)，在神經質、反芻思考及負向情感關係中的條件性調節式中介效果(conditional moderated mediation)。詳細的條件性調節式中介效果顯示，以情緒調節為第一(主要)干擾變數與知覺組織支持為第二(次要)干擾變數時(即本研究理論架構)，也就是知覺組織支持的變動，會改變情緒調節對於神經質、反芻思考及負向情感的干擾效果。分析顯示在低知覺組織支持狀況下，情緒調節的負向干擾指標達到顯著(index = -.06, SE = .02, 95% CI = [-.12, -.02])；在高知覺組織支持狀況下，情緒調節的干擾指標不顯著(index = -.01, SE = .01, 95% CI = [-.04, .02])。若以情緒調節為第二(次要)干擾變數與知覺組織支持為第一(主要)干擾變數時，在低情緒調節狀況下，知覺組織支持的負向干擾指標達到顯著(index = -.04, SE = .03, 95% CI = [-.10, -.00])；在高情緒調節狀況下，知覺組織支持的干擾指標不顯著(index = .02, SE = .02, 95% CI = [-.02, .07])。綜合以上結果，對假說5提供了穩健的支持。

結果 (英文) 1:

In the overall model, moderated moderated mediation reached significance index (index = .03, SE = .02, 95% CI = [.00, .07]), the secondary display disturbance variables (perceived organizational support), for main interference variable (emotion regulation), in neuroticism, rumination and negative thinking conditional adjustable intermediary effect (conditional moderated mediation) emotional relationship. Detailed conditional adjustable intermediary results show, with emotion regulation as the first (major) disturbance variables and perceived organizational support is second (secondary) interference variable (ie the theoretical framework of this study), which is perceived organizational support changes It will change the regulation for nervousness, and negative thinking ruminant interference effects to emotional mood. Analysis showed that at low tissue support perceived health, negative emotion regulation to achieve significant interference index (index = -.06, SE = .02, 95% CI = [-.12, -.02]); in high perceptual organization support conditions, the interference indicators of emotion regulation not significant (index = -.01, SE = .01, 95% CI = [-.04, .02]). In terms of emotion regulation when a second (secondary) disturbance variables and organizational support perceived as a first (primary) interference variables, in low adjustment emotional condition perceived negative organizational support to achieve significant interference index (index = -.04 , SE = .03, 95% CI = [-.10, -.00]); in high emotion regulation condition, interference index is not significantly perceived organizational support (index = .02, SE = .02, 95% CI = [-.02, .07]). Based on the above results, the hypothesis 5 provides a robust support.

結果 (英文) 2:

In the overall model, the pointer of the moderated moderated mediation reaches a significant point (index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Conditional regulated mediation effect (conditional mediation) in qualitative, ruminative and negative emotional relationships. The detailed conditional regulatory intermediary effect shows that when emotion regulation is the first (primary) interference variable and the perception organization support is the second (minor) interference variable (i.e. the theoretical structure of the study), that is, the change of the cognitive organization support will change the interference effect of mood regulation for neuroticism, ruminative thinking and negative emotion. The analysis shows that the negative interference pointer of mood regulation is significant under the low-perception tissue support condition (index - .06, SE s .02, 95% CI - -.12, -.02) ) and the interference pointer of mood regulation is not significant under the high-perception tissue support condition (index -.01, SE s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .01, 95% CI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . When emotional regulation is used as the second (secondary) interference variable and perception organization support is the first (primary) interference variable, the negative interference pointer supported by the perceptual tissue reaches significant in the low mood condition (index -.04, SE s.03, 95% CI s.10, -.00) In high mood regulation, the interference pointer supported by the perceptual tissue is not significant (index .02, SE s .02, 95% CI , .02, .07). Taken together, the above results provide robust support for hypothesis 5.

結果 (英文) 3:

In the whole model, the index of modeled modeled mediation is significant (index =. 03, SE =. 02, 95% CI = [. 00, . 07), showing the conditional moderated mediating effect in neuroticism, ruminant thinking, and negative affective relationship for the main interfering variables (emotional regulation) The detailed conditioned mediating effect shows that when emotion regulation is the first (main) interfering variable and perceptual organization support is the second (secondary) interfering variable (that is, the theoretical framework of this study), that is, the change of perceptual organization support will change the interfering effect of emotion regulation on neuroticism, ruminating thinking and negative emotion. The analysis shows that in the low perceptual organization support The negative interference index of emotion regulation was significant (index = -. 06, SE =. 02, 95% CI = [-. 12, -. 02]); the interference index of emotion regulation was not significant (index = -. 01, SE =. 01, 95% CI = [-. 04) in the condition of high perceived organizational support, . 02). When emotion regulation is the second (secondary) disturbance variable and perceptual organization support is the first (primary) disturbance variable, the negative disturbance index of perceptual organization support is significant (index = -. 04, SE =. 03, 95% CI = [-. 10, -. 00]) in the low emotion regulation condition, and not significant (index =. 02, SE =. 02) in the high emotion regulation condition, 95% CI = [-. 02,. 07]). Combining the above results, it provides a robust support for Hypothesis 5.