本研究各變數敘述性統計與相關分析如表1所示。神經質分別與反芻思考(r

本研究各變數敘述性統計與相關分析如表1所示。神經質分別與反芻思考(r = .24, p < .01)及負向情感(r = .52, p < .001)呈現正向關係。反芻思考與負向情感呈現正向關係(r = .37, p < .001)。令人意外的是，情緒調節分別與反芻思考(r = .16, p < .05)及負向情感(r = .26, p < .001)，呈現正向關係。知覺組織支持則與反芻思考(r = -.20, p < .001)及負向情感(r = -.21, p < .001)，呈現負向關係。

結果 (英文) 1:

Descriptive statistics of the variables and correlation analysis are shown in Table 1 study. Neuroticism were thinking and rumination (r = .24, p <.01) and negative emotions (r = .52, p <.001) presented a positive relationship. Rumination and negative thinking presented a positive relationship to emotions (r = .37, p <.001). Surprisingly, emotional regulation are thinking and rumination (r = .16, p <.05) and negative emotions (r = .26, p <.001), showing a positive relationship. Perceived organizational support is thinking and rumination (r = -.20, p <.001) and negative emotions (r = -.21, p <.001), showing a negative relationship.

結果 (英文) 2:

The narrative statistics and related analyses of the variables in this study are shown in Table 1. Neuroticness is in a positive relationship with ruminant thinking (r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ruminant thinking presents a positive relationship with negative emotions (r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Surprisingly, mood regulation presents a positive relationship with ruminant thinking (r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Perceived tissue support presents a negative relationship with ruminant thinking (r -.20, p .001) and negative emotion (r -.21, p.001).

結果 (英文) 3:

The descriptive statistics and correlation analysis of each variable in this study are shown in Table 1. Neuroticism is positively correlated with ruminant thinking (r =. 24, P <. 01) and negative emotion (r =. 52, P <. 001). Ruminant thinking is positively correlated with negative emotion (r =. 37, P <. 001). Surprisingly, emotional regulation is positively correlated with ruminant thinking (r =. 16, P <. 05) and negative emotion (r =. 26), P < 0.001), showing a positive relationship, while perceived organizational support showed a negative relationship with rumination (r = -. 20, P < 0.001) and negative emotion (r = -. 21, P < 0.001).