在这一个对比的报告当中，让我知道了公营场地和私营场地这俩种模式是非常的

在这一个对比的报告当中，让我知道了公营场地和私营场地这俩种模式是非常的不同的。在民众方面，Tso Kung Tam Outdoor Recreation Centre是对所有人开放的，而waterfront clubhouse是不对一般民众开放的，它的规模也是比Tso Kung Tam Outdoor Recreation Centre的小很多，这样也让我知道这俩个营运模式也是为了服务不同的民众。所以它们俩个营地的入场率也是大有不同的，因为服务的对象不同，很明显就是Tso Kung Tam Outdoor Recreation Centre的入场率比较高，而waterfront clubhouse的入场率很明显就是比较低的。其次，在设施方面，也让我知道了公营场地和私营场地也是很不同的，公营场地它的康乐设施是比较的全面的，而私营场地因为场地的面积有限，它所提供的设施也是比较的少的，也没有什么户外的设施。最后，这一个对比的报告之中，也让我懂得了，如何的去推广活动，让这一些的康乐活动有更多的人参加，其次就是场地的设施维修也可以提高营地的入场率，如果推广活动和维修设施能够同时进行的话，我觉得入场率就会变高，因为推广活动，借此可以吸引不同的人来参加，再者就是修护好设施，这样就可以不会因为设施的突然损坏，而导致参加者不能游玩，让参加者觉得该营地的管理不妥善，减少再来的机会。

結果 (英文) 1:

In this report a comparison of them, let me know and maybe the public space and private space patterns are very different. In terms of people, Tso Kung Tam Outdoor Recreation Centre is open to all, and waterfront clubhouse is not open to the general public, its size is smaller than the Tso Kung Tam Outdoor Recreation Centre a lot, so let me know and maybe has a business model but also to people of different services. So they both camps admission rate is much different because different objects and services, it is clear that the admission rate Tso Kung Tam Outdoor Recreation Centre relatively high, while the waterfront clubhouse admission rate is very obvious is relatively low .
Secondly, in terms of facilities, but also let me know the public space and private space is very different, it's public site recreational facilities is more comprehensive, while the private area of the site because of the limited space, the facilities it provides is more of less, there is no outdoor facilities.
Finally, in contrast to a report this, let me know, how to campaign, so that some of the recreational activities that more people participate, followed by maintenance facility sites can also increase the rate of admission to the camp, If the promotion and maintenance of facilities can be performed simultaneously, I think the admission rate will be high, because promotional activities, thereby attract different people to participate, addition is good repair facilities, so you can not because facilities sudden damage, which led the participants can not play, so that participants feel the camp management is not appropriate to reduce the chance of return.

結果 (英文) 2:

In this comparative report, I know that the two models of public and private sites are very different. On the public side, Tso Kung Tam Outdoor Outdoor All OrR Centre is open to all, and the waterfront clubhouse is not open to the general public, and it is also larger than Tso Kung Tam Outdoor The Different Centre is much smaller, which also makes me know that these two operating models are also designed to serve different people. So the admission rates for the two camps are also very different, because the service is different, it is obvious that Tso Kung Outdoor Outdoor All OrR Centre admission rate is relatively high, and the attendance rate of the waterfront clubhouse is obviously relatively low.
Secondly, in terms of facilities, I also know that public and private sites are very different, public sites and their recreational facilities are relatively comprehensive, and private sites because of the limited area of the site, it provides relatively few facilities, and there are no outdoor facilities.
Finally, this comparison of the report, but also let me know, how to promote activities, so that some of these recreational activities have more people to participate, and secondly, the site facilities maintenance can also improve the camp entrance rate, if the promotion activities and maintenance facilities can be carried out at the same time, I think the admission rate will become higher, because of the promotion activities, This can attract different people to participate, and then repair facilities, so that no because of the sudden damage to the facilities, resulting in participants can not play, so that participants feel that the camp is not properly managed, reduce the chances of return.

結果 (英文) 3:

In this comparative report, let me know that the two modes of public and private venues are very different. In terms of the masses, Tso Kung Tam outdoor recreation center is open to all, while the water front club house is not open to the general masses, and its scale is also larger than that of TSO Kung Tam outdoor recreation The center is much smaller, which also let me know that these two operation modes are also for serving different people. So the admission rates of the two camps are also very different, because the service objects are different. It is obvious that the admission rates of TSO Kung Tam outdoor reclamation center are relatively high, while the admission rates of the water front clubhouse are obviously relatively low.
Secondly, in terms of facilities, I also know that public venues and private venues are also very different. Public venues have relatively comprehensive recreational facilities, while private venues, because of the limited area of the venue, provide relatively few facilities, and have few facilities outside the home.
Finally, in this comparative report, I also learned how to promote activities and let more people participate in these recreational activities. Secondly, the site facilities maintenance can also improve the admission rate of the camp. If promotion activities and maintenance facilities can be carried out at the same time, I think the admission rate will be higher, because promotion activities can attract different people The second is to repair the facilities, so that the sudden damage of the facilities will not cause the participants to be unable to play, which makes the participants feel that the management of the camp is not proper and reduces the chance of coming again.