In this comparative report, I know that the two models of public and private sites are very different. On the public side, Tso Kung Tam Outdoor Outdoor All OrR Centre is open to all, and the waterfront clubhouse is not open to the general public, and it is also larger than Tso Kung Tam Outdoor The Different Centre is much smaller, which also makes me know that these two operating models are also designed to serve different people. So the admission rates for the two camps are also very different, because the service is different, it is obvious that Tso Kung Outdoor Outdoor All OrR Centre admission rate is relatively high, and the attendance rate of the waterfront clubhouse is obviously relatively low.<br>Secondly, in terms of facilities, I also know that public and private sites are very different, public sites and their recreational facilities are relatively comprehensive, and private sites because of the limited area of the site, it provides relatively few facilities, and there are no outdoor facilities.<br>Finally, this comparison of the report, but also let me know, how to promote activities, so that some of these recreational activities have more people to participate, and secondly, the site facilities maintenance can also improve the camp entrance rate, if the promotion activities and maintenance facilities can be carried out at the same time, I think the admission rate will become higher, because of the promotion activities, This can attract different people to participate, and then repair facilities, so that no because of the sudden damage to the facilities, resulting in participants can not play, so that participants feel that the camp is not properly managed, reduce the chances of return.
正在翻譯中..
