不可否認的，陪審團有可能遭有心人士利用，例如利用人頭去登記陪審團席位，

不可否認的，陪審團有可能遭有心人士利用，例如利用人頭去登記陪審團席位，然後不管怎麼抽簽都會抽到自己組織內的人，所以可以把持判決。陪審團的人是自主去登記陪審，在美國甚至有出席費，可能讓許多無業者利用為賺錢的機會，而真正具有專業素養者卻透過同樣的機會抽簽，如此的陪審團知識水準參差不齊，容易產生偏頗的認知，而使判決不客觀。法官在審理的過程就算明知被告有罪亦不能判其罪行，因為還需要透過陪審團的認可，例如，若美國巨星麥可傑克森之案其實他是有犯罪，但是可能因為陪審團中多數人因為非常喜愛這位明星，受其明星光環所影響，而使判決不公，這對受害者是萬分氣忿的事

結果 (英文) 1:

Admittedly, the jury may have been determined to take advantage of people, such as the use of the head to register the jury seats, then no matter how the lottery will be able to get people within their own organization, so you can grip the decision. The jury of people to register is independent jury in the United States and even attendance fee, may take advantage of so many opportunities for the unemployed to make money, while the real person with professional knowledge but through the same opportunities to draw, so the jury uneven level of knowledge prone to cognitive bias, the decision not objective. During the trial judge even knowing that the defendant is guilty also can not judge their crimes, because the jury also recognized the need to pass through, for example, if the US superstar Michael Jackson's case, in fact he is a criminal, but probably because most people because the jury very fond of the star, the star aura by its influence, the ruling unfair, it is extremely indignant thing for victims

結果 (英文) 2:

There is no denying that juries may be used by would-be people, such as using their heads to register jury seats, and then drawing lots from people in their organization severing their own, so they can hold a verdict. Jury persons are self-registered jury, even in the United States even attendance fees, may allow many unemployed people to take advantage of the opportunity to make money, while the real professional is through the same opportunity to draw lots, so that the level of jury knowledge is uneven, easy to produce biased perception, and make the sentence not objective. The judge cannot convict the defendant even if he knows he is guilty in the trial, because it still needs to be approved by a jury, for example, if the case of American superstar Michael Jackson is actually a crime, but probably because most people on the jury because they love the star very much, because of his star aura, and the sentence is unfair. It's a great deal for the victims.

結果 (英文) 3:

It is undeniable that a jury may be used by interested persons, such as those who use their heads to register for jury seats, and then draw lots of people from their own organizations no matter how they draw lots, so they can control the verdict. The jury's people are those who register for jury on their own, and even have the presence fee in the United States, which may allow many unemployed people to take advantage of the opportunity to make money, while those who are really professional actually Through the same opportunity to draw lots, such a jury's level of knowledge is uneven, which may lead to biased cognition and make the verdict not objective. Even if the judge knows the defendant is guilty, he cannot be convicted of the crime, because it still needs to be recognized by the jury. For example, if the case of Michael Jackson, an American superstar, is actually a crime, it may be because the majority of the jury is guilty People are very fond of the star and are affected by the star's aura, which makes the judgment unfair, which is very angry for the victims