經由以上討論可知，各個學者對人際寬恕所抱持的理念和定義各有不同，本研究

經由以上討論可知，各個學者對人際寬恕所抱持的理念和定義各有不同，本研究以探討外遇傷害正向轉變之人際寬恕，其寬恕定義較傾向涉及「個人內在」之寬恕歷程反應，而不強調外遇雙方之「和解」歷程，是故，一個外遇受傷之女性，她可能決定留在婚姻中，或是決定離婚，只要她經歷個人內在對傷害者的寬恕歷程，她就可以朝正向轉變之康復大道邁進，是故採取此面向人際寬恕定義，對受傷者是更寬闊、更自由的。是故本研究對人際寬恕提出的定義為：「人際寬恕是指一個人，面對造成他或她傷害事件的傷害者，予以寬恕的個人內在轉化歷程，經過此寬恕歷程，最後他或她可以達到正向生活適應的功能。故人際寬恕發生對象是人，而不是物體或事件。以因配偶外遇事件受傷的女性為例，她經過個人內在對傷害者的寬恕歷程，最後她可以減低憤怒、羞愧、低自尊等複雜負向情緒，而漸漸朝向情緒穩定、快樂、信任等正向情緒，以及達到重新面對生活的正向能力。」
在對寬恕定義的議題上，許多研究者正在對「什麼是寬恕，什麼不是寬恕」開始形成共識，但其間研究者對人與人之間寬恕的應用看法仍不一致，許多替代名詞描述個體的自我內在寬恕歷程，以及描述個人的臨床介入(Reed,1998；Rainey,2008)。

結果 (英文) 1:

Through the above discussion, by various scholars on interpersonal forgive hold differing concepts and definitions, this study to examine the affair hurt the positive transformation of interpersonal forgiveness, forgive defines more inclined to relate to "intrinsic" forgiving course response rather than an affair both sides " Reconciliation "process, therefore, an affair wounded female, she may decide to stay in the marriage or decide to divorce, inner forgiveness to the injured person as long as her personal history, she can keep moving forward into rehabilitation road, are so take this interpersonal forgiveness-oriented definition on injured is more spacious, more freedom.Is presented in this study on interpersonal forgive is defined as: "the interpersonal forgiving is a person in the face of injury caused his or her injuries, personal inner transformation process of clemency, over the course of forgiveness, he or she can achieve positive life adjustment function. Interpersonal forgiving people, instead of objects or events. A case study of female injured spouse having an affair, her inner forgiveness to the injured person through the personal process, and finally she can reduce the anger, complex negative emotions such as shame, low self-esteem, emotional stability, positive emotions, such as happiness, trust,As well as the ability to reach forward to face life again. "
On the topic of forgiveness definition, many researchers are working on" what is forgiveness, what is not to forgive "began to form a consensus, but researcher applications perspectives on forgiveness from person to person is not consistent, many alternative terms describe the individual inner forgiveness process, and describe individual clinical interventions (Reed,1998;Rainey,2008).

結果 (英文) 2:

Via the above discussion, various scholars on interpersonal forgiveness that hold different ideas and definitions of this study to investigate the affair hurt interpersonal forgiveness of positive change, the more inclined to involve the definition of forgiveness Forgiveness "intrapersonal" the process of reaction, and The two sides stressed the affair is not the "reconciliation" process, the actual occurrence, an affair injured woman, she may decide to stay in the marriage, or decide to divorce, as long as she has experienced personal inner journey of forgiveness for those who hurt, she can move forward Rehabilitation of the road changes ahead, the actual occurrence of interpersonal forgiveness for taking this definition, the injured person is a broader, more freedom. Therefore in the definition of the research on interpersonal forgiveness that is: "interpersonal forgiveness is a person, the face of harm by his or her injuries, be personal inner transformation process of forgiveness through the forgiveness process, and eventually he or she can achieve positive life adjustment function. enemy forgive one happens is people, not objects or events in the event of injury due to the spouse having an affair women, for example, she passed on the injured person's personal inner journey of forgiveness, and finally she can reduce anger, shame Low self-esteem and other negative emotional complexity, and gradually toward emotional stability, happiness, confidence and other positive emotions, as well as achieve the ability to face life positively. "
in the definition for forgiveness issues, many researchers are right, "What forgiveness, forgiveness and what is not, "began to form a consensus, but the views of forgiveness during which researchers use among people is still inconsistent, many alternative terms describe the course of an individual's inner self forgiveness, and a description of the individual's clinical intervention (Reed, 1998; Rainey, 2008).

結果 (英文) 3:

May know by way of the above discussion, each scholar the interpersonal forgiveness embraces has the difference to the idea and definition that respectively, this research to discuss the extramarital affair injury to the transformation the interpersonal forgiveness, its forgiveness definition favors related to "individual intrinsic" the forgiveness course responded that but did not stress that extramarital affair both sides "reconciliation" course, therefore, an extramarital affair is injured the female, she possibly decides to keep in the marriage, or decides to divorce, so long as she experiences individual intrinsic to the forgiveness course of impairer, she can make great strides forward toward the recovery of main road forward transformation, therefore adopts this to face the interpersonal forgiveness definition, is broadly and is more free to the injured party.Therefore this research to the definition that the interpersonal forgiveness proposed is: "Interpersonal forgiveness refers to a person, facing creating him/her injures the impairer of event, individual intrinsic transformed course that forgives, forgives the course after this, finally he/she can achieve the function that the forward life adapts. Therefore the interpersonal forgiveness has the object is a human, but is not the object or the event. Uses because of spouse extramarital affair event injured feminine as an example, she passes through individual intrinsic to the forgiveness course of impairer, finally she can decrease the angry, ashamed and low self-respect and other complex negative mood, but faces the mood gradually stably, joyful, trust and other forward mood,As well as achieves faces the forward ability of life."Subject of
to forgiving in definition, many researchers to "anything are being the forgiveness, anything is not forgiveness" starts to reach the consensus, but the researcher was inconsistent among people the application view of forgiveness in this period, the self-intrinsic forgiveness courses of many substitution noun description individuals, as well as described individual clinical involvement (Reed,1998; Rainey,2008).