發現第2次討論的情感平均分數為三週中最低，因此對該週內容作檢視，發現該

發現第2次討論的情感平均分數為三週中最低，因此對該週內容作檢視，發現該週同學發言較為激進，比起其他兩週多了一些負面詞語，例如:不要插嘴，不能用，角度不對…等等，進而導致該週的情感分數在計算出來後較低。

結果 (英文) 1:

Emotional found the average score for the second time to discuss three weeks minimum, so as to view the content of this week, I found that the week the students speak more radical than the other two weeks some negative words, such as: do not interrupt, can not be used, angular misalignment ... etc., which led to the lower periphery of the emotion scores calculated after.

結果 (英文) 2:

Found that the emotional average score of the 2nd discussion was the lowest in three weeks, so a review of the content of the week found that the week's students spoke more aggressively, compared to the other two weeks more negative words, such as: don't interject, can't use, angle is not right... and so on, which in turn resulted in lower emotional scores for the week.

結果 (英文) 3:

It is found that the average emotional score of the second discussion is the lowest in three weeks. Therefore, it is found that the students' speech in this week is more radical than that in the other two weeks, with some negative words, such as: don't interrupt, can't use, the angle is not right, etc., which leads to the lower emotional score in this week after calculation.