1.清楚地定義目標研究的目標應該定義清楚，並盡可能精確地描述專有名詞的

1.清楚地定義目標
研究的目標應該定義清楚，並盡可能精確地描述專有名詞的意義，避免使研究報告的讀者對研究者是否充分了解問題產生質疑。
2.詳細的研究過程
研究者應充分描述研究程序的細節，以提供其他研究者重複驗證該研究的機會。
3.全面規劃研究設計
應該仔細規畫研究程序的設計，盡可能產生客觀的結果，如當母體採用某種某種抽樣方式，報告中就應該證明樣本的代表性，或是使用直接觀察法，在事件發生之後，應盡快紀錄，在選擇與紀錄資料時，也應將個人偏誤所帶來的影響降至最低。
4.運用高道德標準
研究者在設計與執行研究計畫時，要有保護措施，以防參與者的身心受到傷害，並優先考量資料的正當性，與遵守、不逾越社會的道德議題。
5.坦承揭露研究限制
研究者應該完全坦承研究程序設計的缺點，並估計其對研究發現的影響，比較期望與實際程序的差別。
6.為決策者的需求進行適當的分析
資料分析範圍應該與其重要性相符，使用適當的分析方法去仔細檢查資料的效度和信度，分類資料的方式，要能協助研究者達成中肯的結論，並清楚表達推論所得的研究發現。
7.明確提出研究發現
研究者應盡力做到最客觀，提供給決策者的資料簡報應該是綜合性又易於了解的，務必要讓決策者迅速找到研究發現的關鍵點。
8.可驗證的結論
必須以充分的資料為根據，限定研究結論的範圍，研究者常以個人經驗與解釋，而非以研究資料及分析結果為基礎，誇大歸納法得出的結論。
9.反應研究者的經驗
如果研究者是有經驗、具良好研究聲譽，管理者就會對這份研究更具信心，能否讓研究報告的讀者得到研究者充分的資訊，是判斷一份研究可信度，根據這項理由，研究報告應該包含研究者資格證明的相關資訊

結果 (英文) 1:

1. clearly defined objectivesResearch objectives should be clearly defined and described as accurately as possible the meaning of proper names to avoid readers of the study raises questions about whether the researchers are fully aware of the problem.2. detailed research processResearchers should fully describe the details of the research program to provide opportunities for other researchers replicated the study.3. a comprehensive planning study on designResearch program should be carefully planned design, produce objective results as possible, such as when the mother with some kind of a sampling, the report should prove the representativeness of the sample, or use direct observation, in the aftermath of the event, should be recorded as soon as possible, in the selection and record data, the impact of personal bias should also be kept to a minimum.4. applying high ethical standardsResearchers in the design and implementation of research projects, protection measures are required in case of participants with trauma, and justification of priority data, and compliance, socio-ethical issues is not exceeded.5. admitted exposing research limitedResearchers should be fully acknowledged the shortcomings of the research program, and to estimate the impact of its findings, compare differences in expectations and the actual program.6. the proper analysis of the demand for policy makersData analysis should be commensurate with its importance, using appropriate methods of analysis to examine the validity and reliability of data, classification data, and to help researchers reach a fair conclusion, and clear inference from the study findings.7. the proposed study findsResearchers should try to be the most objective, provide data to policy makers briefing should be comprehensive and easy to understand, be sure to let decision makers quickly found the key points.8. a verifiable conclusionShould be based on adequate data, limit the range of conclusions, researchers often use personal experiences and interpretation, rather than based on research data and analysis results, exaggerating the induction conclusion.9. the reaction the researchers ' experienceIf a researcher is experienced, has good reputation research, managers will be more confident on this, would you let the readers with the researchers of the study sufficient information, is the credibility to judge a study, based on this reason, the study should contain related information for researcher qualification

結果 (英文) 2:

1. Have a clear definition of the target
objectives of the study should be clearly defined and described as accurately as possible the meaning of proper names, to avoid research reports whether the reader to fully understand the problems the researchers questioned.
2. Detailed study
investigator should fully describe the details of research programs to provide opportunities for other researchers replicated the study.
3. The comprehensive planning study design
should carefully planning research program designed to produce objective results as possible, such as when the mother using some certain sampling method, the report should prove a representative sample, or using direct observation, After the incident, we should record as soon as possible, in the selection and record data, should also be the impact of the individual errors to a minimum.
4. The use of high ethical standards
in the design and implementation investigator research projects, there must be protection against physical and mental harm participants, and the first priority of the legitimacy of information, and comply with, do not exceed the ethical issues of society.
5. Limitations of the study admitted exposing
researchers should be fully acknowledged shortcomings research program design and estimate its impact on the research findings, compare the difference between the desired and actual program.
6. For the needs of policy makers to make necessary analysis
data analysis range should be consistent with its importance, the use of appropriate methods of analysis to carefully check the validity and reliability of the information, the way classification data, to be able to assist investigators pertinent conclusions reached, and articulate findings resulting inferences.
7. The findings clearly
researchers should try to do the most objective information available to decision-makers should be comprehensive briefing and easy to understand, be sure to let the decision-makers to quickly find key research findings.
8. verifiable conclusions
must be based on adequate information as the basis for defining the scope of research findings, the researchers often personal experience and interpretation, rather than to study the information and analysis based on the results, exaggerating induction conclusion.
9. The experience of the reaction of researchers
if the researchers are experienced, with good research reputation, the manager will be more confident on this study, the ability to let researchers study report readers get sufficient information to judge a study credibility, according to the reason, the study should include qualifications of investigator Information

結果 (英文) 3:

1 clearly defined goals and objectives should be defined clearly, and to accurately describe the meaning of the term, to avoid the problem of whether the Research Report of the reader to the full understanding of the problem.
2. detailed study of the process should be fully described by the researchers to study the details of the program to provide other researchers to repeat the study of the opportunity. . comprehensive planning and design study
should be careful planning of program design, as far as possible to produce objective results, such as when the parent with some sampling, report should demonstrate the representativeness of the sample, or is the use of direct observation, in the aftermath of the incident, should record as soon as possible.In the choice and record of information, it should also be the impact of the individual errors brought to the lowest.
4. using high moral standards
the researchers in the design and implementation of the research plan, to protect the body and mind, to prevent the physical and mental harm, and to give priority to the legitimacy of the data, and to comply with, not to exceed the moral issues of society.
5. admits that the research limitations of the study should be fully admitted to the shortcomings of the research program design, and to estimate the impact of the research findings, comparing the differences between expectations and the actual process.
6. analysis of the needs of the decision makers should be appropriate,Using appropriate analytical methods to examine the validity and reliability of the data, the method of classification of data can help the researchers to conclude the relevant conclusions, and to find out the results of the study.
7. explicitly proposed that the study should try to be the most objective and provide the information of the decision makers should be comprehensive and easy to understand.
8. can verify the conclusion that it is necessary to limit the scope of the research conclusions. The study is based on the personal experience and interpretation, rather than on the basis of the research data and the analysis results.
9.Reaction of the empirical
if researchers are experienced, with good reputation, managers will be on this study confidence, can let the readers of the report of the full information is a research credibility judgment. According to this reason, the research report should include the qualification certificate information