課程於2018年7月至2019年9月進行八次共133人，認知部分前測平

課程於2018年7月至2019年9月進行八次共133人，認知部分前測平均為71.4分，後測為88.3分，後測顯著高於前測(t=19.31,P< .001)。技能部分以技術查核表評核通過達100%，課程評值部分(Likert scale)「我覺得這次的學習較以前傳統上課效果還要好」平均達4.7分、「我覺得課程中使用的教材如影帶、規範、給藥模擬用物等，有助於我的學習」平均達4.7分、「如果有機會，我希望再利用這種方式學習」平均達4.6分、「我覺得我有踴躍參與這次教學過程」平均達4.5分、「經過這次學習後，我的知識與技能有增加」平均達4.5分，「我覺得我在學習過程中表現不錯」平均達4.5分。整體滿意度達滿意以上為100%。

結果 (英文) 1:

133 courses in total eight July 2018 to September 2019, cognitive components pretest mean of 71.4 minutes, 88.3 minutes after the test, significantly higher than that measured after pretest (t = 19.31, P <.001) . Skills section to Product Review Technology Check nuclear by 100%, curriculum evaluation value portion (Likert scale) "I think this study than before the traditional school even better results," an average of 4.7 points, "I think the lesson using materials such as video with, specification, simulation with the administration, etc., help me to learn, "an average of 4.7 points," if given the opportunity, I hope to take advantage of this way of learning, "an average of 4.6 points," I think I have to take part in the the teaching process, "an average of 4.5 points," after this study, I have knowledge and skills increase, "an average of 4.5 points," I think I did well in the learning process, "an average of 4.5 points. Satisfaction with overall satisfaction of more than 100%.

結果 (英文) 2:

The course was conducted eight times between July 2018 and September 2019 for a total of 133 people, with an average of 71.4 for the cognitive pre-test and 88.3 points for the back test, which was significantly higher than the previous test (t-19.31, P.001). The skill part is approved by 100% of the technical review table, the course evaluation part (Likescale) "I think this study is better than the previous traditional class effect" average of 4.7 points, "I think the teaching materials used in the course such as video tapes, norms, drug simulation, etc., help my learning" average of 4.7 Scores, "If i have the opportunity, I hope to learn in this way" average 4.6 points, "I feel I have actively participated in this teaching process" average 4.5 points, "after this study, my knowledge and skills have increased" average 4.5 points, "I think I did well in the learning process" average 4.5 points. Overall satisfaction reached satisfaction above 100%.

結果 (英文) 3:

From July 2018 to September 2019, the course was conducted eight times for 133 people, with an average score of 71.4 points in the pre-test and 88.3 points in the post test, which was significantly higher than the pre test (t = 19.31, P <. 001). The skill part passed the technical checklist by 100%, and the course evaluation part (Likert Scale) "I think this study is better than the previous traditional class", with an average of 4.7 points, "I think the teaching materials used in the course, such as videos, specifications, drug administration simulation materials, etc., are helpful to my study", with an average of 4.7 points, "if there is an opportunity, I hope to use this way to learn again", with an average of 4.6 points, "I think I have an active participation in this teaching process" with an average of 4.7 points 4.5 points, 4.5 points for "after this learning, my knowledge and skills have increased" and 4.5 points for "I think I did well in the learning process". The overall satisfaction is 100%.