因此我們推論反芻思考較容易引發負向情感，一些縱貫面與橫斷面的研究，也發

因此我們推論反芻思考較容易引發負向情感，一些縱貫面與橫斷面的研究，也發現反芻思考可以預測負向情感(e.g., Moberly & Watkins, 2008; Silvia, Eichstaedt, & Phillips, 2005; Trapnell & Campbell, 1999; Wang et al., 2013)。因此，本研究提出以下假說： Hypothesis 4: 反芻思考與負向情感呈現正向關係。

結果 (英文) 1:

Therefore, we infer ruminant think the more easily lead to negative emotions to a number of studies, surface and longitudinal cross-section, also found that rumination thinking can predict negative emotions (eg, Moberly & Watkins, 2008 ; Silvia, Eichstaedt, & Phillips, 2005; Trapnell & Campbell, 1999; Wang et al, 2013).. Therefore, this study proposes the following hypothesis:
Hypothesis 4: rumination and negative thinking presented a positive relationship to emotions.

結果 (英文) 2:

Therefore, we deduced that ruminant thinking is more likely to trigger negative emotion, and some studies of cross-sectional and cross-sectional, we also found that ruminant thinking can predict negative emotion (e.g., Moberly and Watkins, 2008; Silvia, Eichstaedt, and Phillips, 2005; Trapnell and Campbell, 1999; Wang et al., 2013). Therefore, the following hypotheses are proposed in this study:
Hypothesis 4: Ruminant thinking presents a positive relationship with negative emotions.

結果 (英文) 3:

Therefore, we infer that ruminant thinking is more likely to cause negative emotions. Some longitudinal and cross-sectional studies have also found that ruminant thinking can predict negative emotions (e.g., Moberly & Watkins, 2008; Silvia, eichstaedt, & Phillips, 2005; Trapnell & Campbell, 1999; Wang et al., 2013). Therefore, the following hypotheses are proposed in this study:
Hypothesis 4: Ruminant thinking and negative emotion show a positive relationship.