在這個案子，判決書共58頁，參與判決得法官共5位，其中判決書紀錄了案子

在這個案子，判決書共58頁，參與判決得法官共5位，其中判決書紀錄了案子的各方面，從經過到判決都記錄得非常清楚，可見普通法得確定性，其中所創造的3個原則雖然前面沒有判例，但也能很快的歸納推理並適用，不向成文法需要曠日廢時，可見普通法得彈性。

結果 (英文) 1:

In this case, a total of 58 verdict, the judges involved in the decision was a total of five, which record a verdict in all aspects of the case, from the decision to go through all record very clearly visible common law was certainty, which created three principles Although there is no case before, but also can quickly and apply inductive reasoning, drawn out when not need to waste statute, common law was seen elasticity.

結果 (英文) 2:

In this case, the judgment a total of 58 pages, the participation of the judge a total of 5, of which the judgment recorded all aspects of the case, from the passage to the judgment are recorded very clearly, it can be seen that common law certainty, which created three principles although there is no precedent, but also can quickly general reasoning and application, not to the written law needs to be suspended, It can be seen that the common law has elasticity.

結果 (英文) 3:

In this case, there are 58 pages of written judgment and 5 judges participating in the judgment. The written judgment records all aspects of the case, which is very clear from the process to the judgment. It can be seen that the common law has certainty. Although there is no precedent in front of the three principles created, they can also be quickly concluded and applied. When the written law needs to be abandoned, it can be seen that the common law has flexibility.