第一，本研究結合了反應風格理論與資源保存理論提出一架構，嘗試釐清哪些個

第一，本研究結合了反應風格理論與資源保存理論提出一架構，嘗試釐清哪些個體資源與社會資源，能夠協助員工改善神經質對於反芻思考與負向情感的影響。根據Nolen-Hoeksema, Parker, and Larson(1994)的說法，反芻思考關注的是造成憂鬱的原因和後果，而非關注與神經質有關的負面情感和自我聚焦認知，但這樣的區別並未受到實證檢驗(Bagby & Parker, 2001)。然而，本研究發現反芻思考與負向情感的連結，研究結果呈現個體的情緒調節能力與知覺組織支持，可以協助高神經質的個體，減輕反芻思考與負向情感。也就是說在高情緒調節與高知覺組織支持的條件下，個體的神經質對於反芻思考的直接效果，以及對於負向情感的間接效果，將可有效減緩。反之，在低情緒調節與低知覺組織支持的條件下，個體的神經質更容易產生反芻思考，進而產生負向情感。

結果 (英文) 1:

First, this study combines style theory and theoretical reaction save resources proposed a framework, which attempts to clarify the individual resources and social resources, can help employees improve nervousness impact on ruminant thinking and negative emotions. According to Nolen-Hoeksema, Parker, and Larson (1994) argument, ruminant think concern is caused by depression causes and consequences, rather than focus on the negative emotions associated with nervousness and self-awareness focus, but this difference was not subject to empirical testing (Bagby & Parker, 2001). However, this study found that rumination negative thinking and emotional link, the research results are presented individuals the ability to regulate emotions and perceived organizational support, you can help the individual high neuroticism, reduce rumination thinking and negative emotions. That under conditions of high emotion regulation and high perceived organizational support, individual neurotic thinking for ruminant direct effects and the indirect effect of negative emotions, it will effectively slow down for. On the other hand, under conditions of low emotion regulation and low perceived organizational support, neurotic individuals more prone to rumination thinking, and produce negative emotions.

結果 (英文) 2:

First, this study combines reaction style theory with resource preservation theory to put forward a framework, try to clarify which individual resources and social resources, can help employees to improve the influence of neuroticism on ruminant thinking and negative emotion. According to Nolen-Hoeksema, Parker, and Larson (1994), ruminant thinking focuses on the causes and consequences of depression, rather than on negative emotions and self-focusing cognition associated with neuroticism, but this distinction is not empirically tested (Bagby and Parker, 2001). However, this study found the link between ruminant thinking and negative emotion, and the results show the individual's emotional regulation ability and perception organization support, which can assist highly neurotic individuals and reduce ruminant thinking and negative emotion. That is to say, under the condition of high mood regulation and high perception organization support, the direct effect of the individual's neuroticism on ruminant thinking, as well as the indirect effect of negative emotion, will be effectively slowed down. On the other hand, under the condition of low mood regulation and low-perception tissue support, the individual's neuroticism is more likely to produce ruminant thinking, which in turn produces negative emotion.

結果 (英文) 3:

First, this study proposes a framework combining response style theory and resource conservation theory, trying to clarify which individual resources and social resources can help employees improve the impact of neuroticism on ruminant thinking and negative emotions, According to and Larson (1994), ruminant thinking focuses on the causes and consequences of depression, rather than the negative emotions and self focusing cognition related to neuroticism, but such differences have not been empirically tested, 2001). However, this study found that ruminant thinking is connected with negative emotion. The results show that individual's ability of emotion regulation and perceptual organization support can help individuals with high neuroticism and reduce ruminant thinking and negative emotion. That is to say, under the condition of high emotional regulation and perceptual organization support, the direct effect of individual's neuroticism on ruminant thinking and the effect on ruminant thinking On the contrary, under the condition of low emotion regulation and low perceptual organization support, the individual's neuroticism is more likely to produce ruminant thinking and then negative emotion.