人際寬恕是一個歷程，其發生對象是人，而不是物體或事件(Enright

人際寬恕是一個歷程，其發生對象是人，而不是物體或事件(Enright &Coyle, 1998)。Enright所帶領的研究團隊(The Human Development Study Groupy)在1991年對寬恕做一個重要的界定，他們認為寬恕本質上是一個內在的回應，但是必須有另外一個人或人們作為它的參照點，透過此觀點，
故寬恕應該是一個人的內在反應。但是若是將寬恕視為「和解」的話，依據此想法其定義則必須至少須包含兩個人(Enright, Eastin, Golden ,Sarinopoulos,&Freedman,1992)。
Freedman(1998)支持此想法，認為和解僅為一個想法或者也可能成為寬恕歷程的結果，但並非寬恕的目標。

結果 (英文) 1:

Interpersonal forgiving is a journey, and its object is a person, instead of an object or event (Enright & Coyle, 1998). Enright led research team (The Human Development Study Groupy) in 1991 to an important definition of forgiveness, they think of forgiveness is essentially an internal response, but you must have another person or people as its point of reference through this perspective,
forgiveness should be an intrinsic reaction. But pardon if be regarded as "settled", based on this idea its definition must contain at least two people (Enright, Eastin, Golden, Sarinopoulos,&Freedman,1992)。
Freedman (1998) supports this idea, arguing that reconciliation was only an idea or you could become a forgiving course results, but not the goal of forgiveness.

結果 (英文) 2:

Interpersonal forgiveness is a process, which occurs objects are people, not objects or events (Enright & Coyle, 1998). Enright led the research team (The Human Development Study Groupy) in 1991 for forgiveness made ​​an important definition, they believe forgiveness is essentially an internal response, but there must be another person or people as its point of reference, through this view,
it is the intrinsic reaction should forgive a person. But if the forgiveness as "reconciliation," then, according to this idea, you must define it must contain at least two people (Enright, Eastin, Golden, Sarinopoulos, & Freedman, 1992).
Freedman (1998) supports this idea that reconciliation is only an idea, or it may be the result of a process of forgiveness, but forgiveness is not the goal.

結果 (英文) 3:

The interpersonal forgiveness is a course, its has the object is the human, but is not the object or the event (Enright &Coyle, 1998). The research team that Enright leads (The Human Development Study Groupy) to forgiving made important limits in 1991, they think that the forgiveness was an intrinsic response, but must have another people or the people as its reference point, by this viewpoint,
, therefore forgave should be person's mediation responses. If will forgive regards as "reconciliation", must at least probably contain two people according to this idea its definition (Enright, Eastin, Golden, Sarinopoulos,&Freedman,1992).
Freedman(1998) supports this idea, thinks that reconciliation is only an idea or also possibly becomes the result of forgiving the course, but is not the goal of forgiveness.