第二，反芻思考是一個認知過程，對於目標追求失敗後反覆與消極的想法(Li

第二，反芻思考是一個認知過程，對於目標追求失敗後反覆與消極的想法(Liang et al., 2018; Nolen-Hoeksema et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2013)，當員工進行反芻思考與情緒調節時，會耗費認知資源(Levens et al., 2009)，因此此時若有其他的資源挹注，可減緩反芻思考。本研究提出個體的資源—情緒調節為主要干擾變數，以及社會資源—知覺組織支持為次要干擾變數。研究結果顯示，當個體擁有情緒調節與知覺組織支持時，可降低神經質、反芻思考及負向情感間的關係，但是當個體擁有較低程度的情緒調節與知覺組織支持時，神經質透過反芻思考對於負向情感的間接效果呈現顯著。不僅如此，moderated moderated mediation結果呈現，兩個干擾變數皆具有條件性調節式中介效果(conditional moderated mediation)，顯示這兩種資源，對於神經質、反芻思考及負向情感的關係間，是重要的干擾因子。

結果 (英文) 1:

Second, rumination thinking is a cognitive process, with repeated negative thoughts (Liang et al, 2018.; Nolen-Hoeksema et al, 2008;.. Wang et al, 2013) after the failure of the pursuit of the target, when employees were thinking ruminant and emotional adjustment, will consume cognitive resources (Levens et al., 2009), and therefore at this time if inject additional resources, can slow rumination thinking. This study presents the individual resources - emotional regulation as the main disturbance variables, as well as social resources - perceived organizational support for the minor disturbance variables. The results show that when an individual has the emotion regulation and perceived organizational support, can reduce nervousness, rumination and negative thinking, but when an individual has a low degree of emotion regulation and perceived organizational support, neurotic thinking through the relationship between emotional rumination for presents significant negative indirect effect of the emotion. Not only that, moderated moderated mediation results are presented, two disturbance variables are adjustable with a conditional mediation effect (conditional moderated mediation), show both resources for nervousness, thinking and rumination negative relationship between emotional disturbance is important factor.

結果 (英文) 2:

. ความสัมพันธ์ (สายแสดงด้วยเส้นประ) และรุ่นที่ดีที่สุด (เส้นแสดงที่มีจุด) ระหว่าง pH (A), ความเป็นกรด (B) และ TMC (C) และΔE ของตัวบ่งชี้ที่20° c

結果 (英文) 3:

Second, ruminant thinking is a cognitive process. For repeated and negative thoughts after the failure of goal pursuit (Liang et al., 2018; Nolen hoeksema et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2013), when employees ruminate and adjust their emotions, they will consume cognitive resources (Levens et al, 2009). Therefore, if other resources are injected at this time, ruminant thinking can be slowed down. This study proposes that individual resource emotion regulation is the main interference variable, and social resource perceptual organization support is the secondary interference variable. The results show that when individuals have emotional regulation and perceptual organization support, the relationship among neuroticism, ruminant thinking and negative emotion can be reduced, but When the individual has a lower level of emotional regulation and perceptual organization support, the indirect effect of neuroticism on negative emotion through ruminating thinking is significant. Moreover, the results of modeled modeled mediation show that both of the interference variables have conditional modeled mediation effect Mediation) shows that these two resources are important interference factors for the relationship between neuroticism, ruminant thinking and negative emotion.